Lutz Bornmann

  1. Citation impact of papers published from six prolific countries: A national comparison based on InCites data.

    Authors: Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff
    Subjects: Digital Libraries
    Abstract

    Using the InCites tool of Thomson Reuters, this study compares normalized
    citation impact values calculated for China, Japan, France, Germany, United
    States, and the UK throughout the time period from 1981 to 2010. The citation
    impact values are normalized to four subject areas: natural sciences;
    engineering and technology; medical and health sciences; and agricultural
    sciences. The results show an increasing trend in citation impact values for
    France, the UK and especially for Germany across the last thirty years in all
    subject areas.

  2. Normalizing the measurement of citation performance: Principles for comparing sets of documents.

    Authors: Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff, Tobias Opthof, Rüdiger Mutz
    Subjects: Digital Libraries
    Abstract

    Using citation analysis, sets of documents can be compared as independent
    samples; for example, in terms of average citation counts using potentially
    different reference sets. From this perspective, the size of samples matters
    only for the identification of significant differences and estimating margins
    of error. Using the percentile rank approach, differences among citation
    distributions can be studied non-parametrically and in a single scheme.
    Comparison among the sets clarifies that the different sizes of samples affect
    the weighing of the probabilities and therefore the rankings.

  3. A Meta-evaluation of Scientific Research Proposals: Different Ways of Comparing Rejected to Awarded Applications.

    Authors: Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff, Peter van den Besselaar
    Subjects: Computers and Society
    Abstract

    Combining different data sets with information on grant and fellowship
    applications submitted to two renowned funding agencies, we are able to compare
    their funding decisions (award and rejection) with scientometric performance
    indicators across two fields of science (life sciences and social sciences).
    The data sets involve 671 applications in social sciences and 668 applications
    in life sciences. In both fields, awarded applicants perform on average better
    than all rejected applicants.

  4. Citation Environment of Angewandte Chemie.

    Authors: Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff, Werner Marx
    Subjects: Digital Libraries
    Abstract

    Recently, aggregated journal-journal citation networks were made accessible
    from the perspective of each journal included in the Science Citation Index see
    (this http URL). The local matrices can be used to inspect the
    relevant citation environment of a journal using statistical analysis and
    visualization techniques from social network analysis. The inspection gives an
    answer to the question what the local impact of this and other journals in the
    environment is. In this study the citation environment of Angewandte Chemie was
    analysed.

  5. New approaches for increasing the reliability of the h index research performance measurement.

    Authors: Lutz Bornmann, Ruediger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel
    Subjects: Applications
    Abstract

    In the year 2005 Jorge Hirsch introduced the h index for quantifying the
    research output of scientists. Today, the h index is a widely accepted
    indicator of research performance. The h index has been criticized for its
    insufficient reliability - the ability to discriminate reliably between
    meaningful amounts of research performance.

RSS-материал