Using the InCites tool of Thomson Reuters, this study compares normalized
citation impact values calculated for China, Japan, France, Germany, United
States, and the UK throughout the time period from 1981 to 2010. The citation
impact values are normalized to four subject areas: natural sciences;
engineering and technology; medical and health sciences; and agricultural
sciences. The results show an increasing trend in citation impact values for
France, the UK and especially for Germany across the last thirty years in all
subject areas.
Using citation analysis, sets of documents can be compared as independent
samples; for example, in terms of average citation counts using potentially
different reference sets. From this perspective, the size of samples matters
only for the identification of significant differences and estimating margins
of error. Using the percentile rank approach, differences among citation
distributions can be studied non-parametrically and in a single scheme.
Comparison among the sets clarifies that the different sizes of samples affect
the weighing of the probabilities and therefore the rankings.
Combining different data sets with information on grant and fellowship
applications submitted to two renowned funding agencies, we are able to compare
their funding decisions (award and rejection) with scientometric performance
indicators across two fields of science (life sciences and social sciences).
The data sets involve 671 applications in social sciences and 668 applications
in life sciences. In both fields, awarded applicants perform on average better
than all rejected applicants.
Recently, aggregated journal-journal citation networks were made accessible
from the perspective of each journal included in the Science Citation Index see
(this http URL). The local matrices can be used to inspect the
relevant citation environment of a journal using statistical analysis and
visualization techniques from social network analysis. The inspection gives an
answer to the question what the local impact of this and other journals in the
environment is. In this study the citation environment of Angewandte Chemie was
analysed.
In the year 2005 Jorge Hirsch introduced the h index for quantifying the
research output of scientists. Today, the h index is a widely accepted
indicator of research performance. The h index has been criticized for its
insufficient reliability - the ability to discriminate reliably between
meaningful amounts of research performance.