In 1996, my brilliant student John Noonan, discovered, and proved that there
are 3(2n)!/(n(n+3)!(n-3)!) ways to line-up n people of different heights in
such a way that out of the n(n-1)(n-2)/6 possible triples of people exactly one
is such that the tallest stands (not necessarily immediately) in front of the
second-tallest, who in turn, stands (not necessarily immediately) in front of
the shortest. In that article, I promised a prize of 25 dollars for a nice
combinatorial proof. Alex Burstein gave such a proof. On Oct. 14, 2011, I
talked about Alex's lovely proof at the Howard U.
We comment on, elaborate, and extend the work of Warren Ewens and Herbert
Wilf, described in their this http URL
about the maximum in balls-and-boxes problem. In particular we meta-apply their
ingenious method to show that it is not really needed, and that one is better
off using the so-called Poisson Approximation, at least in applications to the
real world, because extremely unlikely events mever happen in real life.
In order to appreciate how good we as mathematicians and scientists have it
today, with extremely fast hardware and lots and lots of memory, as well as
with readily available high-level software, both for numeric and symbolic
computation, it may be a good idea to go back to the early days of electronic
computers and carefully examine, as a case study, a problem that was considered
a huge challenge back then, and compare notes. We chose C.L. Pekeris' 1958
seminal work on the ground state energies of two-electron atoms.
There is no trivial mathematics, there are only trivial mathematicians! A
mathematician is trivial if he or she believes that there exists trivial
mathematics. Being a non-trivial mathematician myself, I will describe ten
different proofs of the seemingly trivial fact that the number of ways of
choosing k people out of n people is less than or equal to the number of ways
of choosing k+1 people out of n people, provided that k is less than half of n.
The conjecture that the orbit-counting generating function for totally
symmetric plane partitions can be written as an explicit product-formula, has
been stated independently by George Andrews and David Robbins around 1983. We
present a proof of this long-standing conjecture.
We present an elegant bijection between standard Young tableaux with 2n cells
and at most two rows, and pairs of standard Young tableaux of the same shape,
with n+1 cells, where only the top row can have more than one cell.
Irving John ("Jack") Good (9 December 1916 - 5 April 2009) was one of my
greatest heroes and influencers. On Oct. 25, 2009, I gave a twenty-three minute
talk with the present title, and this article is an extended transcript of that
talk. As with all my papers, the "accompanying" Maple package is much more
important (mathematically, of course, I also talk about the human side of Jack
in this article, and this is even more important than any math). In particular,
I taught Jack's brilliant ideas to my computer, and now it can do even better
than Jack.
One of the "deepest" theorems in mathematics is Endre Szemer\'edi's theorem
about the inevitability of arithmetical progressions. Here we try to nibble at
it, by doing "finite" analogs. This is already interesting for its own sake,
but we believe that it has the potential to lead to extremely interesting
sharpening of the currently rather weak bounds. Let's hope!
Along with introducing the theory behind the finite analogs of Szemer\'edi's
Theorem, full Maple, Mathematica, and Java code is provided. See paper for
further details.
We prove that the multiset {(RightArmLength,LeftArmLength)} ranging over all
cells of all Ferrers diagrams with n cells equals the multiset
{(RightArmLength,LegLength)} ranging over all cells of all Ferrers diagrams
with n cells, thereby refining a multi-set identity proved by C. Bessenrodt and
by Bacher and L. Manivel.
Added In revised version: Guo-Niu Han kindly pointed out to us that our main
result is contained in reference [B.H] of the present article.
We prove that the multiset {(RightArmLength,LeftArmLength)} ranging over all
cells of all Ferrers diagrams with n cells equals the multiset
{(RightArmLength,LegLength)} ranging over all cells of all Ferrers diagrams
with n cells, thereby refining a multi-set identity proved by C. Bessenrodt and
by Bacher and L. Manivel.
Added In revised version: Guo-Niu Han kindly pointed out to us that our main
result is contained in reference [B.H] of the present article.
The Mahonian statistic is the number of inversions in a permutation of a
multiset with $a_i$ elements of type $i$, $1\le i\le m$. The counting function
for this statistic is the $q$ analog of the multinomial coefficient
$\binom{a_1+...+a_m}{a_1,... a_m}$, and the probability generating function is
the normalization of the latter. We give two proofs that the distribution is
asymptotically normal. The first is {\it computer-assisted}, based on the
method of moments.