Contact tracing data collected from disease outbreaks has received relatively
little attention in the epidemic modelling literature because it is thought to
be unreliable: infection sources might be wrongly attributed, or data might be
missing due to resource contraints in the questionnaire exercise. Nevertheless,
these data might provide a rich source of information on disease transmission
rate. This paper presents novel methodology for combining contact tracing data
with rate-based contact network data to improve posterior precision, and
therefore predictive accuracy.
Many problems arising in applications result in the need to probe a
probability distribution for functions. Examples include Bayesian nonparametric
statistics and conditioned diffusion processes. Standard MCMC algorithms
typically become arbitrarily slow under the mesh refinement dictated by
nonparametric description of the unknown function. We describe an approach to
modifying a whole range of MCMC methods which ensures that their speed of
convergence is robust under mesh refinement.
We present an iterative sampling method which delivers upper and lower
bounding processes for the Brownian path. We develop such processes with
particular emphasis on being able to unbiasedly simulate them on a personal
computer. The dominating processes converge almost surely in the supremum and
$L_1$ norms.
Scaling of proposals for Metropolis algorithms is an important practical
problem in MCMC implementation. Criteria for scaling based on empirical
acceptance rates of algorithms have been found to work consistently well across
a broad range of problems. Essentially, proposal jump sizes are increased when
acceptance rates are high and decreased when rates are low. In recent years,
considerable theoretical support has been given for rules of this type which
work on the basis that acceptance rates around 0.234 should be preferred.
Scaling of proposals for Metropolis algorithms is an important practical
problem in MCMC implementation. Criteria for scaling based on empirical
acceptance rates of algorithms have been found to work consistently well across
a broad range of problems. Essentially, proposal jump sizes are increased when
acceptance rates are high and decreased when rates are low. In recent years,
considerable theoretical support has been given for rules of this type which
work on the basis that acceptance rates around 0.234 should be preferred.