Pascal Koiran

  1. Shallow Circuits with High-Powered Inputs.

    Authors: Pascal Koiran
    Subjects: Computational Complexity
    Abstract

    A polynomial identity testing algorithm must determine whether an input
    polynomial (given for instance by an arithmetic circuit) is identically equal
    to 0. In this paper, we show that a deterministic black-box identity testing
    algorithm for (high-degree) univariate polynomials would imply a lower bound on
    the arithmetic complexity of the permanent. The lower bounds that are known to
    follow from derandomization of (low-degree) multivariate identity testing are
    weaker.

  2. Symmetric Determinantal Representation of Formulas and Weakly Skew Circuits.

    Authors: Bruno Grenet, Pascal Koiran, Natacha Portier, Erich Kaltofen
    Subjects: Computational Complexity
    Abstract

    We deploy algebraic complexity theoretic techniques for constructing
    symmetric determinantal representations of formulas and weakly skew circuits.
    Our representations produce matrices of much smaller dimensions than those
    given in the convex geometry literature when applied to polynomials having a
    concise representation (as a sum of monomials, or more generally as an
    arithmetic formula or a weakly skew circuit). These representations are valid
    in any field of characteristic different from 2.

  3. Arithmetic circuits: the chasm at depth four gets wider.

    Authors: Pascal Koiran
    Subjects: Computational Complexity
    Abstract

    In their paper on the ``chasm at depth four'', Agrawal and Vinay have shown
    that polynomials in m variables of degree O(m) which admit arithmetic circuits
    of size 2^o(m) also admit arithmetic circuits of depth four and size 2^o(m).
    This theorem shows that for problems such as arithmetic circuit lower bounds or
    black-box derandomization of identity testing, the case of depth four circuits
    is in a certain sense the general case. In this paper we show that smaller
    depth four circuits can be obtained if we start from polynomial size arithmetic
    circuits.

  4. A Dichotomy Theorem for Polynomial Evaluation.

    Authors: Pascal Koiran, Irénée Briquel
    Subjects: Computational Complexity
    Abstract

    A dichotomy theorem for counting problems due to Creignou and Hermann states
    that or any nite set S of logical relations, the counting problem #SAT(S) is
    either in FP, or #P-complete. In the present paper we show a dichotomy theorem
    for polynomial evaluation. That is, we show that for a given set S, either
    there exists a VNP-complete family of polynomials associated to S, or the
    associated families of polynomials are all in VP.

  5. The multivariate resultant lies between NP and AM.

    Authors: Bruno Grenet, Pascal Koiran, Natacha Portier
    Subjects: Computational Complexity
    Abstract

    The resultant of a square system of homogeneous polynomials is a polynomial
    in their coefficients which vanishes whenever the system has a solution. Canny
    gave an algorithm running in polynomial space to compute it but no lower bound
    was known. We investigate the complexity of the associated decision problem and
    give a hardness result: Testing the resultant for zero lies in the class
    Arthur-Merlin and is NP-hard. We give a randomized reduction and a
    deterministic reduction for NP-hardness. The latter can be seen as a
    derandomization result.

  6. A hitting set construction, with application to arithmetic circuit lower bounds.

    Authors: Pascal Koiran
    Subjects: Computational Complexity
    Abstract

    A polynomial identity testing algorithm must determine whether a given input
    polynomial is identically equal to 0. We give a deterministic black-box
    identity testing algorithm for univariate polynomials of the form $\sum_{j=0}^t
    c_j X^{\alpha_j} (a + b X)^{\beta_j}$. From our algorithm we derive an
    exponential lower bound for representations of polynomials such as
    $\prod_{i=1}^{2^n} (X^i-1)$ under this form. It has been conjectured that these
    polynomials are hard to compute by general arithmetic circuits.

Syndicate content