For portfolio choice problems with proportional transaction costs, we discuss
whether or not there exists a shadow price, i.e., a least favorable
frictionless market extension leading to the same optimal strategy and utility.
By means of an explicit counter-example, we show that shadow prices may fail to
exist even in seemingly perfectly benign situations, i.e., for a log-investor
trading in an arbitrage-free market with bounded prices and constant
transaction costs of arbitrary size. We also clarify the connection between
shadow prices and duality theory.
We present a unified approach to Doob's $L^p$ maximal inequalities for $1\leq
p<\infty$. The novelty of our method is that these martingale inequalities are
obtained as consequences of elementary \emph{deterministic} counterparts. The
latter have a natural interpretation in terms of robust hedging. Moreover our
deterministic inequalities lead to new versions of Doob's maximal inequalities.
These are best possible in the sense that equality is attained by properly
chosen martingales.
In a market with one safe and one risky asset, an investor with a long
horizon, constant investment opportunities, and constant relative risk aversion
trades with small proportional transaction costs. We derive explicit formulas
for the optimal investment policy, its implied welfare, liquidity premium, and
trading volume. At the first order, the liquidity premium equals the spread,
times share turnover, times a universal constant. Results are robust to
consumption and finite horizons.
We consider the maximization of the long-term growth rate in the
Black-Scholes model under proportional transaction costs as in Taksar, Klass
and Assaf [Math. Oper. Res. 13, 1988]. Similarly as in Kallsen and Muhle-Karbe
[Ann. Appl. Probab., 20, 2010] for optimal consumption over an infinite
horizon, we tackle this problem by determining a shadow price, which is the
solution of the dual problem. It can be calculated explicitly up to determining
the root of a deterministic function.
We revisit the problem of maximizing expected logarithmic utility from
consumption over an infinite horizon in the Black-Scholes model with
proportional transaction costs, as studied in the seminal paper of Davis and
Norman [Math. Operation Research, 15, 1990]. Similarly to Kallsen and
Muhle-Karbe [Ann. Appl. Probab., 20, 2010], we tackle this problem by
determining a shadow price, that is, a frictionless price process with values
in the bid-ask spread which leads to the same optimization problem. However, we
use a different parametrization, which facilitates computation and
verification.
We give an elementary proof of the celebrated Bichteler-Dellacherie Theorem
which states that the class of stochastic processes $S$ allowing for a useful
integration theory consists precisely of those processes which can be written
in the form $S=M+A$, where $M$ is a local martingale and $A$ is a finite
variation process. In other words, $S$ is a good integrator if and only if it
is a semi-martingale. We obtain this decomposition rather directly from an
elementary discrete-time Doob-Meyer decomposition.
In this article we consider a Brownian motion with drift of the form
\[dS_t=\mu_t dt+dB_t\qquadfor t\ge0,\] with a specific nontrivial
$(\mu_t)_{t\geq0}$, predictable with respect to $\mathbb{F}^B$, the natural
filtration of the Brownian motion $B=(B_t)_{t\ge0}$.
The duality theory of the Monge--Kantorovich transport problem is analyzed in
a general setting. The spaces $X, Y$ are assumed to be polish and equipped with
Borel probability measures $\mu$ and $\nu$. The transport cost function
$c:X\times Y \to [0,\infty]$ is assumed to be Borel. Our main result states
that in this setting there is no duality gap, provided the optimal transport
problem is formulated in a suitably relaxed way.
The paper is accompanying "A general Duality Theorem for the
Monge-Kantorovich Transport Problem". We explain the methods used in this
article in an elementary setting and present two examples complementing the
results obtained therein.